Women Having Power over Men or Men Having Power Over Women - 1Tim2:11-15/1Cor7:1/1Cor9:5 CLARITY
Women Having Power over Men or Men Having Power Over Women - 1Tim2:11-15/1Cor7:1/1Cor9:5 CLARITY
Some verses concerning Women that have been taken greatly OUT OF CONTEXT both for Men themselves as well as Women concerning the SPIRIT AND TRUTH CHURCH IN AND OF CHRIST
1 Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me:
It is good for a man (brother) not to touch (affectionately fondle of oneness of flesh & being aside from even other brothers) a woman (sister)
[:----* " it is good for a woman not to touch (sister not to affectionate fondle of oneness of flesh & being aside from even other brothers) a man (brother) " *----:]
(-it is GOOD FOR A MAN TO TOUCH HIS WIFE/GOOD FOR A WOMAN TO TOUCH HER HUSBAND-)
1 Corinthians 9:5 Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?
1 Timothy 2:11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Where the word of God speaks of a woman not suposed to "exert authority over"/"usurp (swindle/bribing gain advantage of)"/deceptively attain power over, it is a specific concern of people who have addressed the basis of basic every day ongoings even amongst children of both male and female, communication, and not only these, but also occupation based ongoings of memeber(s) of Spirit and Truth Community.
This does not mean "do not talk to", and by all means DOES INFACT MEAN "DO NOT ENGAGE IN "INORDINATE AFFECTION" DEEMING IT AS IF CONVERSATION OR COMMUNICATION, some whom do so seemingly casualy, even confrontational, and these perversions actualy being of jezabel balak and Salaam doctrine concerning all between men and women of all ages.
Why 1 Corinthians 7 says "It is Good for a man not to touch a woman", IS OF AND FOR MANY CAUSES AND REASONS, this showing that SELF CONTROL OF BROTHERLY AND SIATERLY KIND, is of mutual BOTH WAY IN ALL COMMUNITY CONSIST(s)/CONSISTING(s).
Some people have made it out as of Men themselves also aught to never have basic conversation with a person of sister, WHICH IS GREATLY REVEALED IN THE VERY ADRESS OF DEPARTMENTAL POSITONING AND ADMINISTRATION OF BASIC INFORMATIONAL MATTERS, ASIDE FROM "ONDILGENCE OF PERSOSN" IN THINGS WHICH PERTAIN NOT TOWARDS ANY IN-BETWEEN OF MEN AND WOMEN AS GENERAL BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN CHRIST, but otherwise things that are of progression and towardsness in concern(s) of oneness of flesh and any communicativeness DESPITE WHOMEVER IT MAY BE MAN OR WOMAN ALWAYS BEING WITHIN ANS OF SUCH NATURE EVEN IF SEEMING GENERAL, WHICH IS ALWAYS OBVIOUS, AND FOR MORE THAT USUAL, OUT OF CONTEXT OF NECESSITY OR ANY KIND OR PART(s) OF SPIRIT AND TRUTH REALITY.
The very obvious portion that is expressingly exposed in all communicativeness between men and women IS THE CONSIDERATION AND CONSIDERABILITY BETWEEN AND AMONGST OF ALL IN ALL AREAS OF WELL BEING, ESPECIALY BECAUSE THIS MENTION IS ABOUT MALE AND FEMALE, THE UTMOST CONSIDERSTION OF EACH OTHER'S ETRRNAL ONENESS OF FLESH AND BEING FOR BOTH AND ALL PARTIES REGARDLESS IF HAVING OR NOT HAVING.
This "SILENCE" mentioned, being that or no adressinga or provocation towards the entertains and friction of oneness of flesh, which becomes of women because of their heartfelt nature of womb-age in childbearing, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANT TO ALL OTHER KINDS OF FRUITFULNESS but which should and aught yo remain separate from all brotherly and sisterly conduct amongst (-this is not e.g. asking if someone has or does not have their oneness of flesh and being, BUT THIS GREATLY AND ALREADY OBVIOUS AT ALL TIMES CONCERNING WOMEN OR MEN BY THE ONGOING AND SO FORTH OF THEIR CONDUCT AND SELF/SELVES-), but more for sakes of the overall reality that Such Oneness of flesh and being is TRANCENDANCE ABOVE (-there is/are no greater two who agree about mutuality that that kind of concern between two of etenral oneness of flesh and being-) ALL OTHER RELATIONSHIPS, BOTH PARENTING AND CHILDREN, being that neither having been fleshly manifest from, or having had fleshly manifest children from themselves ARE NOT ONE-FLESH/BEING WITH EITHER OF THESE, all else and these two BEING FELLOW BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN CHRIST JESUS.
That is where the line is dran concerning learning in silence FROM ONE'S OWN HUSBAND, if something of question is INFORMATIONAL it being entirely different in asking if asked or drawn by husbandry/wifery inquiring, than brotherly/sisterly inquiring, E.G., someone asking "hay nice shoes, where did you get those?", their admiration being either brother or sister can come from two places, (1) as a brother or sister asking BECAUSE THEY CAN TELL THAT THE KIND ARE NOT OR WORLDLY MAN MADE REGULATORY AND UTILITY BASED, OBVIOUSLY GOING SOMEWHERE IN THE USE OF (-e.g. hiking boots - if that is the reason worn-), such asking from a brother might want to know where he can find his own kind of pair of hiking boots because of having looked everywhere he could and found of no such equipment, she perhaps knowing where she got them (a place that can have both men and women's fits, usualy camping and such things are always as such) also having as such vastness of the kind of shoe(s), (2) THE WRONG KIND OF ASKING WHERE THE SISTER GOT THE SHOES FROM WOULD COME FROM JUST HOW THEY LOOK ON HER, ADMIRING FEMININITY OF THEM, NOT INTERESTED IN THE SHOES BUT HERSELF AND OTHERWISE THAN THE SHOES, WHERE THEY WE'RE ACQUIRED, ***AND IF TO NOTE OF HER ACTUALY GOING HIKING OR NOT OBVIOUSLY WANTING TO FROM WHEREVER THIS ASK OF "...hay nice shoes..." JUST SO THAT THE BROTHER (-or in some cases the sister asking for sakes of such times and age we are in-) CAN TAG ALONG OR FOLLOW THEM, EVEN LOOKING FOR INFORMATION OF WHERE THEY ARE GOING OF SUCH ATIRE, of course, this being a very highly unlikely question from a brother to a sister to ask in basic transit of commune and communication, obviously the first obviousness would be the basic greeting, if knowing each other from aby past, then completely and directly to as necesary with all liberty, even to concern of the shoes and the nature of etc being g only brotherly or sisterly.
For 1 Cor 9:5 "knowing g from. GENESIS 1:26-27, that AS THE ANGELS", where Jesus spoke and noted for us THAT WE ARE FROM THE BEGINING, the entire pair of a male and female as Etrrnal Oneness of Flesh and Being IS AN ANGEL (-eternaly-), thevword angel Meaning a number of things, firstly of Person(s) AS ETERNAL BEING, seccondly as Objective by occupation and resonance for all co-existence EVERYONE BEING MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE, the word "Angel in Hebrew, Arab, and basicaly all languages" meaning MESSENGER/SERVANT, as we know for a fullness of sibling BEING OUR HEAVENLY FATHER'S CHILDREN IN JESUS CHRIST.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Where the word of God speaks of a woman not suposed to "exert authority over"/"usurp (swindle/bribing gain advantage of)"/deceptively attain power over, it is a specific concern of people who have addressed the basis of basic every day ongoings even amongst children of both male and female, communication, and not only these, but also occupation based ongoings of memeber(s) of Spirit and Truth Community.
This does not mean "do not talk to", and by all means DOES INFACT MEAN "DO NOT ENGAGE IN "INORDINATE AFFECTION" DEEMING IT AS IF CONVERSATION OR COMMUNICATION, some whom do so seemingly casualy, even confrontational, and these perversions actualy being of jezabel balak and Salaam doctrine concerning all between men and women of all ages.
Why 1 Corinthians 7 says "It is Good for a man not to touch a woman", IS OF AND FOR MANY CAUSES AND REASONS, this showing that SELF CONTROL OF BROTHERLY AND SIATERLY KIND, is of mutual BOTH WAY IN ALL COMMUNITY CONSIST(s)/CONSISTING(s).
Some people have made it out as of Men themselves also aught to never have basic conversation with a person of sister, WHICH IS GREATLY REVEALED IN THE VERY ADRESS OF DEPARTMENTAL POSITONING AND ADMINISTRATION OF BASIC INFORMATIONAL MATTERS, ASIDE FROM "ONDILGENCE OF PERSOSN" IN THINGS WHICH PERTAIN NOT TOWARDS ANY IN-BETWEEN OF MEN AND WOMEN AS GENERAL BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN CHRIST, but otherwise things that are of progression and towardsness in concern(s) of oneness of flesh and any communicativeness DESPITE WHOMEVER IT MAY BE MAN OR WOMAN ALWAYS BEING WITHIN ANS OF SUCH NATURE EVEN IF SEEMING GENERAL, WHICH IS ALWAYS OBVIOUS, AND FOR MORE THAT USUAL, OUT OF CONTEXT OF NECESSITY OR ANY KIND OR PART(s) OF SPIRIT AND TRUTH REALITY.
The very obvious portion that is expressingly exposed in all communicativeness between men and women IS THE CONSIDERATION AND CONSIDERABILITY BETWEEN AND AMONGST OF ALL IN ALL AREAS OF WELL BEING, ESPECIALY BECAUSE THIS MENTION IS ABOUT MALE AND FEMALE, THE UTMOST CONSIDERSTION OF EACH OTHER'S ETRRNAL ONENESS OF FLESH AND BEING FOR BOTH AND ALL PARTIES REGARDLESS IF HAVING OR NOT HAVING.
This "SILENCE" mentioned, being that or no adressinga or provocation towards the entertains and friction of oneness of flesh, which becomes of women because of their heartfelt nature of womb-age in childbearing, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANT TO ALL OTHER KINDS OF FRUITFULNESS but which should and aught yo remain separate from all brotherly and sisterly conduct amongst (-this is not e.g. asking if someone has or does not have their oneness of flesh and being, BUT THIS GREATLY AND ALREADY OBVIOUS AT ALL TIMES CONCERNING WOMEN OR MEN BY THE ONGOING AND SO FORTH OF THEIR CONDUCT AND SELF/SELVES-), but more for sakes of the overall reality that Such Oneness of flesh and being is TRANCENDANCE ABOVE (-there is/are no greater two who agree about mutuality that that kind of concern between two of etenral oneness of flesh and being-) ALL OTHER RELATIONSHIPS, BOTH PARENTING AND CHILDREN, being that neither having been fleshly manifest from, or having had fleshly manifest children from themselves ARE NOT ONE-FLESH/BEING WITH EITHER OF THESE, all else and these two BEING FELLOW BROTHERS AND SISTERS IN CHRIST JESUS.
That is where the line is dran concerning learning in silence FROM ONE'S OWN HUSBAND, if something of question is INFORMATIONAL it being entirely different in asking if asked or drawn by husbandry/wifery inquiring, than brotherly/sisterly inquiring, E.G., someone asking "hay nice shoes, where did you get those?", their admiration being either brother or sister can come from two places, (1) as a brother or sister asking BECAUSE THEY CAN TELL THAT THE KIND ARE NOT OR WORLDLY MAN MADE REGULATORY AND UTILITY BASED, OBVIOUSLY GOING SOMEWHERE IN THE USE OF (-e.g. hiking boots - if that is the reason worn-), such asking from a brother might want to know where he can find his own kind of pair of hiking boots because of having looked everywhere he could and found of no such equipment, she perhaps knowing where she got them (a place that can have both men and women's fits, usualy camping and such things are always as such) also having as such vastness of the kind of shoe(s), (2) THE WRONG KIND OF ASKING WHERE THE SISTER GOT THE SHOES FROM WOULD COME FROM JUST HOW THEY LOOK ON HER, ADMIRING FEMININITY OF THEM, NOT INTERESTED IN THE SHOES BUT HERSELF AND OTHERWISE THAN THE SHOES, WHERE THEY WE'RE ACQUIRED, ***AND IF TO NOTE OF HER ACTUALY GOING HIKING OR NOT OBVIOUSLY WANTING TO FROM WHEREVER THIS ASK OF "...hay nice shoes..." JUST SO THAT THE BROTHER (-or in some cases the sister asking for sakes of such times and age we are in-) CAN TAG ALONG OR FOLLOW THEM, EVEN LOOKING FOR INFORMATION OF WHERE THEY ARE GOING OF SUCH ATIRE, of course, this being a very highly unlikely question from a brother to a sister to ask in basic transit of commune and communication, obviously the first obviousness would be the basic greeting, if knowing each other from aby past, then completely and directly to as necesary with all liberty, even to concern of the shoes and the nature of etc being g only brotherly or sisterly.
For 1 Cor 9:5 "knowing g from. GENESIS 1:26-27, that AS THE ANGELS", where Jesus spoke and noted for us THAT WE ARE FROM THE BEGINING, the entire pair of a male and female as Etrrnal Oneness of Flesh and Being IS AN ANGEL (-eternaly-), thevword angel Meaning a number of things, firstly of Person(s) AS ETERNAL BEING, seccondly as Objective by occupation and resonance for all co-existence EVERYONE BEING MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE, the word "Angel in Hebrew, Arab, and basicaly all languages" meaning MESSENGER/SERVANT, as we know for a fullness of sibling BEING OUR HEAVENLY FATHER'S CHILDREN IN JESUS CHRIST.
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
#Revelation18SnapBackReminder
#Revelation18SnapBack
#RevelationMusicFamilyZimbabwe
- TeQ NiQ - Kudzai Simbarashe David Murapz - KSDM