Identity Crisis - (Legalizing Multiple Hubandry-Wifery Causes Identity Crisis) - The Mind Of Multiple Husbandry-Wifery Causes Identity Crisis - Multiple Husbandry-Wifery Is "NOT 'A RIGHT' " : - [***Which Can Be Found In The "Logic's Dwindle to People Identifying with "LESS-THAN-OBJECTS" : "The 'Self-Concious-Of-Other(s)' Spirit-and-Truth-Reality"***]

IDENTITY CRISIS - (Legalizing Multiple Hubandry-Wifery Causes Identity Crisis) - The Mind Of Multiple Husbandry-Wifery Causes Identity Crisis - Multiple Husbandry-Wifery Is "NOT 'A RIGHT' " : - [***Which Can Be Found In The "Logic's Dwindle to People Identifying with "LESS-THAN-OBJECTS" : "The 'Self-Concious-Of-Other(s)' Spirit-and-Truth-Reality"***]

For as many that did not know, Legalising Multiple husbandry and Homosexuality as normal or any kind of normalcy amongst mankind leads to people unable to identify with being man or woman, also causing any of those to think monogomy of one man and one woman's nature of oneness of being, known to man made ideology as "marriage", AS THOUGH IT WE'RE GAY/HOMOSEXUAL TO HAVE ONE SINGULAR PARTNER OF MARITAL INTIMACY, LET ALONE TO NOTE THAT ONENESS OF FLESH IS ETERNAL WITH GOD IN WHO'S IMAGE WE ARE ALL MADE WETHER MAN OR WOMAN, EACH WITH EACH'S OWN MUTUALY ETERNAL COMMITMENT OF ONENESS OF FLESH AND BEING BETWEEN ONLY TWO OF ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN AMONGST ALL OTHERS BEING SISTERS AND BRETHREN IN SPIRIT AND TRUTH OF CHRIST JESUS, ALL WITH THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL MUTUAL CONFINES OF SANCTIFIED ONENESS OF FLESH AND BEING, EVERY BROTHER KNOWING THEIR SISTERS ARE ALL OTHER HALVES OF THEIR BROTHERS, AND EVERY SISTER KNOWING THEIR BROTHERS ARE OTHER HALVES OF THEIR SISTERS, MAKING THIS THE "WHERE-FROM" THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL MUTUAL COMMITMENT OF A SINGLE MAN AND A SINGLE WOMAN'S ONENSS OF FLESH AND BEING BECOMES MUTUALY TRANCENDAND ABOVE ANY BROTHERLY OR SISTERLT RELATIONSHIP BECAUSE NO ONE IS ONE FLESH WITH THEIR PARENTS EVEN BEING FRUIT OF THEIR LOINS AND-OR WOMBAGE, ALSO NO ONE BRING ONE FLESH WITH THEIR OWN FRUIT OF LOINAGE AND-OR WOMBAGE, EVEN IF HAVING SHARED A WOMB, THAT STILL NOT ANT DEFINITION OF ONENESS OF FLESH CONFINES, that standardization of multiple-husbandry/-wifery, even going so far to deeming the same for anyone who would opt out of any engagement entirely if there being any across the board standardization of multiple husbandry as well as the over spill of it's same nature which is homosexuality.

THE UTMOSTLY SADEST PART OF THIS IS SINGULAR PEOPLE OF ALL WETHER MALE OR FEMALE, MEN OR WOMEN, EACH AS AN INDIVUDAL MAN OR WOMAN, ---> ** ** MAKING AS THOUGH THEY ARE UNABLE TO COUNT THEIR INDIVIDUAL SELF("selves") AS ONE MAN OR ONE WOMAN, BOTH TO NOTE EVERY MAN OR WOMAN'S SINGULAR MEMBER/INSTRUMENT OF BODILY ENGAGEMENT CONCERNING THE FRUIT OF ALL's LOIN-AGE/WOMB-AGE WHICH ARE ONE FOR EACH MAN AND ONE FOR EACH WOMAN, ** ** <--- This actualy very demeaning to the selves that consider any mutliple husbandry, and the REUSLTANT IDENTITY CRISIS of so many that cause to think themselves able to "identify with animals", more so to alerted consider ANY KIND OF IDENTITY WITH OBJECTS AND THINGS, which is various in the same sense of even a tree that knows that it is not sand, a leaf that knows it is not the fruit with seed of thee tree in it, having all particual functionality amongst, BUT THESE THINGS AND STILL EVEN TO CONSIDER LIVING THINGS KNOWING EACH AND OF EVERY THING THAT THEY ARE, there being no cat that does not think it is a cat, or a dog that does not think it is a dog, nor a bird that does not know the difference between an owl and a chicken, YET MAN-KIND OF CERTAIN PERSONS WILL THINK THEMSELVES TOWARDS MUTLIPLE HUSBANDRY'S HARLOTRY TO IDENTIFY AS IF ANY KIND OF "TRAITION OR CULTURE", OF WHICH THERE ARE NO SUCH KINDS OF CULTURES OR TRADITIONS OF EVEN CONSECUTIVE NECESSITY TO CHANGE AND APRROPRIATED "MORE THAN SINGULAR AND ETERNAL WITHOUT MEASURE OF TIME  MUTUAL COMMITMENT", MUTUALITY CONCERNING THE CONFINES AND SANCTIFIED RELATIONSHIP THAT A SINGLE MAN AND WOMAN'S ONENESS OF FLESH AND BEING ARE, ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE THROGUH CHRIST ALSO AS THE ANGLES ARE (*Genesis1:25-27*).

It would be really shameful in the face of the kinds of people to start a war over wanting and to be more naked as a standard, even to those or any whom want to and are with that being fully covered to the wrists, ankles, top most of neck and covering anyone's actual aparent nakedness with clothing, they would be warring to force them to be more naked as a standard so that they themselves would try to make excuse that their nakedness is sufficiently, or rather, to consider as a "standard of most-age", that less than fully covered is considered fully covered.

The sad part in mention, is that these kinds of people due to belief system(s) by faithful outworking, would indeed desire or demand an island or basic demographic of country to declare as a naked territory. This naked territory would be defined sacred ground and only with diplomatic visitation rights for those who rather to be fully covered. However, with all due seriously amidst the houmour of visitation by fully clothed person-age(s), the frantic of desk work and an office job in "naked territory" would find that if any flatulence(farting) by naken territorialists was of ear, the frightful usual response of action because of the sound alike relativity to bathroom usage, to ask the flatulator (farter) if anything fell to the ground, and to get the mop if necesary, but if the flatulence(fart) coming from the fully clothed, the response being more of an "at least you are wearing clothes", and such AT LEAST being a common grounds of advantage for the "naked territory".

#Revelation18SnapBackReminder

Https://Revelation18SnapBack.BlogSpot.com
Https://RMFSTCSI.BlogSpot.com

#Revelation18SnapBack

- TeQ NiQ - Kudzai Simbarashe David Murapa - KSDM