"NOAH WAS NOT DRUNK, THE HAPPENING WAS..." (***LOOKING FOR HIS FATHER'S NAKEDNESS WHICH IS HIS MOTHER'S NAKEDNESS***)
"NOAH WAS NOT DRUNK, THE HAPPENING WAS..." (***LOOKING FOR HIS FATHER'S NAKEDNESS WHICH IS HIS MOTHER'S NAKEDNESS***)
THE RECORDED "WITNESS OF NOAH IS WHAT WAS 'DRUNKEN' ", NOT THAT THE GRAPES FROM THE VINEYARD PLANTINGS AND MAKING OF WINE WE'RE ANY DRUNKENESSGenesis 9:20 And Noah began to be an husbandman, and he planted a vineyard:
Just as the Lord said for them to be fruitful & multiply & replenish the earth, Noah Having Had His Wife with His 3 Children, no one these days considers that Ham would have been one "towards trying to see his father's nakedness", as the first line of this account speaks of Noah's begining to be "an husband man", meaning MORE CHILDREN THAN THESE 3 THAT SURVIVED THE FLOOD being Ham, Japeth & Shem, MAKING MORE THAN OBVIOUS SENSE THAT THIS ENCOUNTER OF "HAM'S" HAD TO DO WITH NOAH'S INTERACTION WITH THEIR MOTHER, SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT OF HIS ORDINANCE (--as also seen that the other brothers ***whom we're outside the tent*** did not do any such as "linger in the tent pretending to be asleep",<-some people have these debates, but it is obvious-> or have any questionable wanton of seeing their father's nakedness--).
*****ALSO WHAT IS NOT CONSIDERED BY MANY, IS THE BIRTH OF CANAAN WHICH IS THE PREVIOUS LINE BEFORE NOAH BECOMING AN HUSBANDMAN IS WRITTEN, NOT TO DEBATE WETHER HAM'S WIFE WAS PREGNANT IN TRANSIT OF THE ARK BEING FILLED, WHILE ON IT, OR AFTER IT'S LANDING BECAUSE OF COURSE ALL SUCH ONGOINGS TAKE A MUCH RATHER LONGER TIME-FRAME OF OCCURANCE AND HAPPENING THAN READING THESE FOUR TO FIVE LINES BETWEEN THE RECORDING OF CANAAN'S NAME, NOAH BECOMING AN-HUSBAND-MAN WITH HIS WIFE, AS WELL AS JAPETH AND SHEM'S CONTINUITY AS WELL AS HAM'S AND SUCH AFTERWARDS.
To much consideration AS WE KNOW HOW MUCH SANCTIFICATION ONENESS OF FLESH HAS, even in that the Corinthians are warned by Paul concerning they whom considered it "any-thing" for a man to "have his father's wife", IN THIS SPECIFIC & SIMILAR CASING BEING THE CONCERN OF ONE'S FATHER'S NAKEDNESS OF ONENSS OF FLESH BEING SEEN OR WITNESSED OF WHICHEVER CASE AND KIND OF NATURE, why written in this brief description as though "Shem & Japeth did not linger in the tent pretending to be asleep"
[-:<***if it so assumed that they all shared a single tent, which in the same cannot void any of them having their own because of ALL THREE SON'S HAVING HAD THEIR OWN WIVES ALREADY AS WELL AS CANAAN'S BIRTH AND NAME RECORDED BEFORE THIS INCIDENT>:-].
The next obviousness is anything to do with "HAM SEEING HIS FATHER'S NAKEDNESS (with all due,refference & co-ordinance to His Mother's Nakedness Being His Father's Nakedness Other Half Of Oneness Of Being-) <oneness of flesh encounter/engagement/nature & activity-of-person>, of which anyone due to understanding PERVERSITY'S CONSISTING that such would have had to be on HAM'S PART OF INTRUSION, even evident by NOAH'S EXTREME DISPLEASURE AND NOTICABILITY THAT SUCH INTREAGUE OF HAM'S WOULD BE HIS DOWNFALL, SEEMING AS IF PRONOUNCING A CURSE OF HAM AND CALLING THAT CANAAN WOULD BE A SERVANT SO TO SPEAK, but truly in the nature that his nakeness seeking of His Father's was UNGODLY, as the other brothers by the time HAM made whatever remarkable "reportings" to them, WENT IN BACKWARDS WITH A COVERING TO LAY ON THEIR FATHER [:<...whom by that time would have been asleep even after a considered 'nasty exchange of words' with ham about why he would even be looking for his father's nakedenss having gone to "tell/report" to his brothers about it...(***also to extremely bear in mind that both Noah & His Wife could have been totaly asleep after their such interaction which in description of them both in the tent is "HIS FATHER'S NAKEDENSS OF ONENESS OF FLESH", whatever he was seeking and looking for in the tent could have been collected or sought when they we're awake, that is i if it was any innocence of such kind of happening, though given Noah's contextual making known of both by the other brothers and God himself, it is also very obvious****....)>:] ALL THIS IN THE LINES "TOLD HIS BROTHERS" AND SUCH VASTNESS OF CONSIDERATION THAT ANY OF THEIR FATHER'S NAKEDNESS WAS NOT THEIR NAKEDNESS TO BE ANY WITNESS OF, BEFORE THE OTHER TWO BROTHERS GAVE A SPECIFIC AND HONOURABLE DISPLAY OF TRUTH TO HAM THAT SUCH IS NOT TO BE DONE FOR WHATSOEVER REASON OR KNOWLEDGABILITY <even any nature of how or why Noah & His wife were One Flesh & being none of anyone else's business, such goings for all and everybody's onenss of flesh & "how doings"> , HAM HAVING HIS OWN WIFE ALREADY AS WELL AS CANAAN HIS SON, THE NOTION BEING PERVERSE AND IMMORAL OF SEXUAL TRESSPASS TOWARDS THEIR OWN FATHER.
Genesis 9:22 And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and **"told"** his two brethren "**without**" (Without/Outside -> whom we're NOT INSIDE TRYING IN ANY WAY TO GO AND SEE THEIR FATHER'S NAKEDNESS)
*********9:23 And Shem and Japheth took a garment, and laid it upon both their shoulders, and went backward, and covered the nakedness of their father; and their faces were backward, and *****they saw not (did not look upon, gaze wantingly upon) their father's nakedness.*******
Genesis 9:24 And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him.
- TeQ NiQ - Kudzai Sombarashe David Murapa - K.S.D.M.